Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
A side-by-side comparison of two llm models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Quick verdict: which should you choose?
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if you need
- ✓Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if you need a documented 51.5 intelligence index and 79.81 t/s output speed.
- ✓Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if you need the lower $0.87 per million tokens pricing.
- ✓Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if you need strong general technical and STEM performance with clear outputs.
- ✓Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if you need balanced coding ability without high inference costs.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if you need
- ✓Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if you need explicit 480B parameter scale for large codebases.
- ✓Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if you need maximum coding specialization focus.
- ✓Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if you need the largest listed model capacity despite $1.8/M pricing.
- ✓Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if you prioritize technical reasoning in a massive open-weight model.
Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro leads on known metrics with a 51.5 intelligence index, 79.81 t/s speed, and $0.87/M price while matching Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's 1M context and open-weight status. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B offers explicit 480B parameter scale and coding specialization but at nearly double the price with unknown speed and intelligence scores. DeepSeek wins on cost-efficiency and measurable performance; Qwen3 appeals where raw model size matters most.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: side by side
| Spec | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | — | 51.5 | Tie |
| Output speed | — | 80 t/s | Tie |
| Output price | $1.80/1M | $0.87/1M | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
| Context | 1049K | 1049K | Tie |
| Params | 480B | — | Tie |
| Type | Open-weight | Open-weight | Tie |
| Provider | Alibaba Qwen | DeepSeek | Tie |
Detailed analysis
Pricing
Winner: DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro costs $0.87 per million tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $1.8 per million tokens. DeepSeek is the clear lower-cost option based on listed prices.
Performance
Winner: DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro provides a measured intelligence_index of 51.5 and lists strong coding plus STEM results. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B lists no intelligence index but emphasizes coding specialization and 480B scale. Available data favors DeepSeek on quantified performance.
Speed
Winner: DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro lists 79.81 tokens per second output speed. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B lists no speed figure but notes high inference compute cost. DeepSeek holds the only concrete speed advantage.
Context & Architecture
Winner: TieBoth models share identical 1048576 token context length and open-weight availability. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B specifies 480B parameters while DeepSeek lists params as unknown. Context handling is equivalent; parameter scale differs.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Pros
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Handles up to 1M token contexts
- +Large-scale model capacity
- +Technical reasoning focus
Cons
- –Text-only modality
- –Less generalist capability outside coding
- –High inference compute cost
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Pros
- +Strong performance on coding tasks
- +Effective handling of very long inputs
- +Clear and structured outputs
- +Good at technical and STEM domains
Cons
- –Text-only modality
- –No real-time information access
- –Can produce hallucinations on facts
Summary: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Select DeepSeek V4 Pro when price, speed, and measured intelligence matter most. Select Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B when maximum parameter count and dedicated coding focus outweigh the higher cost. Both handle 1M contexts equally well as open-weight text models.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro shows advantages on every listed numeric metric including intelligence index, speed, and price while matching context length.