Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs Claude Opus 4.7
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs Claude Opus 4.7: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) | Claude Opus 4.7 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 52.9 | 57.3 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 40 t/s | 51 t/s | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output price | $150.00/1M | $25.00/1M | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Context | 1000K | 1000K | Tie |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
Pros
- +Strong reasoning depth
- +Effective large-context handling
- +Safety-conscious responses
- +Fast inference for its class
Cons
- –May refuse borderline requests
- –Conservative output style
- –Vision limited to static images
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
- +Careful and safety-aligned responses
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) and Claude Opus 4.7 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.