Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.6 (Fast)Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsWinner
Intelligence52.9Tie
Output speed40 t/sTie
Output price$150.00/1M$12.00/1MGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Context1000K1049KGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryProprietaryTie
ProviderAnthropicGoogleTie

Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)

Pros

  • +Strong reasoning depth
  • +Effective large-context handling
  • +Safety-conscious responses
  • +Fast inference for its class

Cons

  • May refuse borderline requests
  • Conservative output style
  • Vision limited to static images
Full Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) review →

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools

Pros

  • +Strong cross-modal coherence on mixed inputs
  • +Effective use of very large context windows
  • +Flexible extension via custom tools

Cons

  • Preview status may include occasional instability
  • Large contexts can increase latency and cost
  • Tool setup requires additional configuration
Full Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons