Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs GPT-5 Mini
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs GPT-5 Mini: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) | GPT-5 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 43.7 | 30.9 | Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) |
| Output speed | 44 t/s | 97 t/s | GPT-5 Mini |
| Output price | $150.00/1M | $2.00/1M | GPT-5 Mini |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
Pros
- +Strong reasoning depth
- +Effective large-context handling
- +Safety-conscious responses
Cons
- –May refuse borderline requests
- –Conservative output style
- –Vision limited to static images
GPT-5 Mini
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts efficiently
- +Integrates text, image, and file inputs
- +Suitable for complex multi-turn tasks
Cons
- –Reduced depth on highly complex reasoning vs full-size models
- –Performance depends on input clarity across modalities
- –May require careful prompting for nuanced outputs
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) and GPT-5 Mini are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.