Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.6Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewWinner
Intelligence52.957.2Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Output speed40 t/s133 t/sGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Output price$25.00/1M$12.00/1MGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Context1000K1049KGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryProprietaryTie
ProviderAnthropicGoogleTie

Claude Opus 4.6

Pros

  • +Strong performance on nuanced reasoning tasks
  • +Careful and safety-aligned responses
  • +Effective handling of large inputs
  • +High-quality structured outputs

Cons

  • Slower response times on complex queries
  • More conservative on borderline topics
  • No native real-time web access
Full Claude Opus 4.6 review →

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Pros

  • +Handles up to 1M token contexts
  • +Native support for audio, image, video, and text
  • +Strong integration of multiple modalities
  • +Effective for large-scale document analysis

Cons

  • Preview model may show inconsistent outputs
  • High resource use with maximum context
  • Requires verification on complex tasks
Full Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons