Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.2-Codex
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.2-Codex: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.6 | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 52.9 | 49 | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Output speed | 40 t/s | 144 t/s | GPT-5.2-Codex |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $14.00/1M | GPT-5.2-Codex |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Opus 4.6 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.6
Pros
- +Strong performance on nuanced reasoning tasks
- +Careful and safety-aligned responses
- +Effective handling of large inputs
- +High-quality structured outputs
Cons
- –Slower response times on complex queries
- –More conservative on borderline topics
- –No native real-time web access
GPT-5.2-Codex
Pros
- +Very large context window for extended inputs
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Seamless integration of text and image data
Cons
- –Restricted to text and image modalities
- –High resource demands at maximum context length
- –No native support for audio or video
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.2-Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.