Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 Nano

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 Nano: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.4 NanoWinner
Intelligence52.944Claude Opus 4.6
Output speed43 t/s147 t/sGPT-5.4 Nano
Output price$25.00/1M$1.25/1MGPT-5.4 Nano
Context1000K400KClaude Opus 4.6
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryProprietaryTie
ProviderAnthropicOpenAITie

Claude Opus 4.6

Pros

  • +Strong performance on nuanced reasoning tasks
  • +Careful and safety-aligned responses
  • +Effective handling of large inputs
  • +High-quality structured outputs

Cons

  • Slower response times on complex queries
  • More conservative on borderline topics
  • No native real-time web access
Full Claude Opus 4.6 review →

GPT-5.4 Nano

Pros

  • +Very large 400k token context
  • +Handles file, image, and text inputs
  • +Multimodal flexibility

Cons

  • Nano size may limit depth on complex tasks
  • No audio or video modalities
Full GPT-5.4 Nano review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 Nano are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons