Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs Claude Opus 4.8

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs Claude Opus 4.8: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.7 (Fast)Claude Opus 4.8Winner
Intelligence57.361.4Claude Opus 4.8
Output speed52 t/s60 t/sClaude Opus 4.8
Output price$150.00/1M$25.00/1MClaude Opus 4.8
Context1000K1000KTie
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryProprietaryTie
ProviderAnthropicAnthropicTie

Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)

Pros

  • +Strong safety alignment
  • +Nuanced and careful reasoning
  • +Effective large-context handling
  • +Fast variant for reduced latency

Cons

  • May decline edge-case or risky requests
  • Multimodal tasks can increase response time
  • Large context usage remains resource-heavy
Full Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) review →

Claude Opus 4.8

Pros

  • +Handles extremely long inputs effectively
  • +Strong multimodal integration of text, images, and files
  • +Careful and nuanced reasoning
  • +Robust safety alignment

Cons

  • Higher latency on large contexts
  • Conservative response style due to safety tuning
  • May require explicit guidance for creative tasks
Full Claude Opus 4.8 review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) and Claude Opus 4.8 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons