Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-4.1 Nano
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-4.1 Nano: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) | GPT-4.1 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 57.3 | 13 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) |
| Output speed | 52 t/s | 168 t/s | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Output price | $150.00/1M | $0.40/1M | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Context | 1000K | 1048K | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
Pros
- +Strong safety alignment
- +Nuanced and careful reasoning
- +Effective large-context handling
- +Fast variant for reduced latency
Cons
- –May decline edge-case or risky requests
- –Multimodal tasks can increase response time
- –Large context usage remains resource-heavy
GPT-4.1 Nano
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native support for images, text, and files
- +OpenAI multimodal architecture
Cons
- –Nano size may reduce depth on complex tasks
- –Performance trade-offs for efficiency
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) and GPT-4.1 Nano are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.