Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-5.2-Codex
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-5.2-Codex: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 53.5 | 40.1 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 146 t/s | GPT-5.2-Codex |
| Output price | $150.00/1M | $14.00/1M | GPT-5.2-Codex |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
Pros
- +Strong safety alignment
- +Nuanced and careful reasoning
- +Effective large-context handling
Cons
- –May decline edge-case or risky requests
- –Multimodal tasks can increase response time
- –Large context usage remains resource-heavy
GPT-5.2-Codex
Pros
- +Very large context window for extended inputs
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Seamless integration of text and image data
Cons
- –Restricted to text and image modalities
- –High resource demands at maximum context length
- –No native support for audio or video
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) and GPT-5.2-Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.