Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast): side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 57.3 | 57.3 | Tie |
| Output speed | 52 t/s | 52 t/s | Tie |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $150.00/1M | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Context | 1000K | 1000K | Tie |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
- +Careful and safety-aligned responses
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
Pros
- +Strong safety alignment
- +Nuanced and careful reasoning
- +Effective large-context handling
- +Fast variant for reduced latency
Cons
- –May decline edge-case or risky requests
- –Multimodal tasks can increase response time
- –Large context usage remains resource-heavy
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.