Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Quick verdict: which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need
- ✓Choose GPT-4.1 if you need maximum output speed at 129.94 tokens per second.
- ✓Choose GPT-4.1 if you need the lowest price at $8 per million tokens.
- ✓Choose GPT-4.1 if you need the largest context window of 1,047,576 tokens.
- ✓Choose GPT-4.1 if you need flexible multimodal processing of images, text, and files together.
Choose GPT-4.1 if you need
- ✓Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need the highest intelligence index of 53.5.
- ✓Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need careful, safety-aligned responses on complex tasks.
- ✓Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need strong reasoning and writing quality with million-token inputs.
- ✓Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need precise handling of text, image, and file inputs.
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7 leads decisively on intelligence (53.5 vs 19.4) and reasoning quality while matching GPT-4.1's million-token multimodal capability. GPT-4.1 wins on speed (129.94 t/s vs 50.25 t/s) and price ($8 vs $25 per million tokens) with a marginally larger context window. The choice hinges on whether raw performance metrics or measured intelligence matter more for the workload.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 53.5 | 19.4 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 119 t/s | GPT-4.1 |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $8.00/1M | GPT-4.1 |
| Context | 1000K | 1048K | GPT-4.1 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Detailed analysis
Intelligence
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 scores 53.5 on the intelligence index compared to GPT-4.1's 19.4. This gap indicates stronger reasoning and writing performance for Claude. Both models support multimodal inputs but Claude emphasizes precision and safety alignment.
Speed
Winner: GPT-4.1GPT-4.1 delivers 129.94 tokens per second versus Claude Opus 4.7's 50.25 tokens per second. The nearly 2.6x speed advantage favors GPT-4.1 for high-throughput multimodal workloads. Claude's lower speed aligns with its noted higher latency on complex tasks.
Pricing
Winner: GPT-4.1GPT-4.1 costs $8 per million tokens while Claude Opus 4.7 costs $25 per million tokens. GPT-4.1 therefore provides substantially lower inference cost for equivalent output volume. Both are proprietary closed-source models from major providers.
Context Window
Winner: GPT-4.1GPT-4.1 offers 1,047,576 tokens of context compared to Claude Opus 4.7's 1,000,000 tokens. The difference is modest but gives GPT-4.1 a slight edge for very large multimodal files. Both models explicitly support million-token-scale inputs across text, images, and files.
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
GPT-4.1
Pros
- +Handles very large context windows
- +Processes images, text, and files together
- +Strong reasoning from OpenAI GPT lineage
Cons
- –Closed-source with no public weights
- –May hallucinate on complex tasks
- –High compute cost for full context
Summary: Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1
Select GPT-4.1 when speed, cost, and maximum context size are priorities. Select Claude Opus 4.7 when the highest intelligence score and cautious, high-quality reasoning are required. The data show clear specialization rather than overall superiority.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on intelligence while GPT-4.1 is faster and cheaper; neither dominates all metrics.