Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1 Nano
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-4.1 Nano: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-4.1 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 53.5 | 7.3 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 112 t/s | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $0.40/1M | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Context | 1000K | 1048K | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
GPT-4.1 Nano
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native support for images, text, and files
- +OpenAI multimodal architecture
Cons
- –Nano size may reduce depth on complex tasks
- –Performance trade-offs for efficiency
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-4.1 Nano are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.