Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 Mini
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 Mini: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 53.5 | 40 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 170 t/s | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $4.50/1M | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
GPT-5.4 Mini
Pros
- +Very large context window
- +Native support for files, images, and text
- +Flexible multimodal workflows
Cons
- –Mini size may reduce depth on complex reasoning
- –Performance depends on input quality across modalities
- –Long contexts can increase latency
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.4 Mini are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.