Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) vs Llama 4 Scout
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) vs Llama 4 Scout: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 61.4 | 13.5 | Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) |
| Output speed | 60 t/s | 112 t/s | Llama 4 Scout |
| Output price | $50.00/1M | $0.30/1M | Llama 4 Scout |
| Context | 1000K | 10000K | Llama 4 Scout |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Open-weight | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast)
Pros
- +Strong safety alignment
- +Nuanced and careful reasoning
- +Effective large-context handling
- +High-quality writing and analysis
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious on edge cases
- –Multimodal performance varies with image clarity
- –Fast mode may trade some depth for speed
Llama 4 Scout
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Strong reasoning over long inputs
Cons
- –High compute cost at maximum context
- –Limited to text and image modalities only
- –May exhibit latency on very long sequences
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and Llama 4 Scout are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.