Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) vs GPT-5.1

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) vs GPT-5.1: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.8 (Fast)GPT-5.1Winner
Intelligence61.427.4Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast)
Output speed62 t/s116 t/sGPT-5.1
Output price$50.00/1M$10.00/1MGPT-5.1
Context1000K400KClaude Opus 4.8 (Fast)
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryProprietaryTie
ProviderAnthropicOpenAITie

Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast)

Pros

  • +Strong safety alignment
  • +Nuanced and careful reasoning
  • +Effective large-context handling
  • +High-quality writing and analysis

Cons

  • Can be overly cautious on edge cases
  • Multimodal performance varies with image clarity
  • Fast mode may trade some depth for speed
Full Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) review →

GPT-5.1

Pros

  • +Very large context window
  • +Native support for images, text, and files
  • +Strong multimodal integration

Cons

  • No audio or video modalities
  • Performance details unverified beyond specs
  • Potential latency with maximum context
Full GPT-5.1 review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.8 (Fast) and GPT-5.1 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons