Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 4 Maverick
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Llama 4 Maverick: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.8 | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 61.4 | 18.4 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Output speed | 60 t/s | 96 t/s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $0.60/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1000K | 1049K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Open-weight | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.8
Pros
- +Handles extremely long inputs effectively
- +Strong multimodal integration of text, images, and files
- +Careful and nuanced reasoning
- +Robust safety alignment
Cons
- –Higher latency on large contexts
- –Conservative response style due to safety tuning
- –May require explicit guidance for creative tasks
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
- +Strong general reasoning performance
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.8 and Llama 4 Maverick are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.