Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-4.1
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-4.1: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.8 | GPT-4.1 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 55.7 | 19.4 | Claude Opus 4.8 |
| Output speed | 62 t/s | 119 t/s | GPT-4.1 |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $8.00/1M | GPT-4.1 |
| Context | 1000K | 1048K | GPT-4.1 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.8
Pros
- +Handles extremely long inputs effectively
- +Strong multimodal integration of text, images, and files
- +Careful and nuanced reasoning
Cons
- –Higher latency on large contexts
- –Conservative response style due to safety tuning
- –May require explicit guidance for creative tasks
GPT-4.1
Pros
- +Handles very large context windows
- +Processes images, text, and files together
- +Strong reasoning from OpenAI GPT lineage
Cons
- –Closed-source with no public weights
- –May hallucinate on complex tasks
- –High compute cost for full context
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-4.1 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.