Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick: side by side
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 34.3 | 14.3 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Output speed | 45 t/s | 94 t/s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Output price | $15.00/1M | $0.60/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1000K | 1049K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta | Tie |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Pros
- +Strong logical coherence
- +Careful safety alignment
- +Effective handling of large contexts
Cons
- –Conservative refusal patterns on edge cases
- –Slower response times on complex inputs
- –Knowledge limited to training cutoff
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.