Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.1-Codex
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.1-Codex: side by side
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.1-Codex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 42.6 | 43.1 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Output speed | 44 t/s | 178 t/s | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Output price | $15.00/1M | $10.00/1M | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Pros
- +Strong logical coherence
- +Careful safety alignment
- +Effective handling of large contexts
- +High-quality multimodal integration
Cons
- –Conservative refusal patterns on edge cases
- –Slower response times on complex inputs
- –Knowledge limited to training cutoff
GPT-5.1-Codex
Pros
- +Strong performance on extended coding workflows
- +Effective integration of visual context with code
- +Handles very large inputs without losing coherence
- +Specialized for software development tasks
Cons
- –Limited to text and image inputs only
- –High computational cost for maximum context
- –May require careful prompt engineering for complex tasks
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.1-Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.