Claude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick: side by side
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4 | Llama 4 Maverick | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | — | 14.3 | Tie |
| Output speed | — | 93 t/s | Tie |
| Output price | $15.00/1M | $0.60/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1000K | 1049K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta | Tie |
Claude Sonnet 4
Pros
- +Strong reasoning and coherence over long inputs
- +Careful safety alignment
- +High-quality, detailed responses
Cons
- –Conservative refusals on sensitive topics
- –No native audio or video support
- –May prioritize caution over maximum helpfulness
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Sonnet 4 and Llama 4 Maverick are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.