Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.2-Codex
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.2-Codex: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 11.4 | 40.1 | GPT-5.2-Codex |
| Output speed | 300 t/s | 146 t/s | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Output price | $0.40/1M | $14.00/1M | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | Tie |
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Pros
- +Optimized for speed and efficiency
- +Strong multimodal integration
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
Cons
- –Reduced depth on highly complex reasoning
- –May underperform full-scale models on nuanced tasks
- –Lite design trades capability for cost and latency
GPT-5.2-Codex
Pros
- +Very large context window for extended inputs
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Seamless integration of text and image data
Cons
- –Restricted to text and image modalities
- –High resource demands at maximum context length
- –No native support for audio or video
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and GPT-5.2-Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.