Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.2-Codex
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.2-Codex: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Flash | GPT-5.2-Codex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.1 | 40.1 | GPT-5.2-Codex |
| Output speed | 200 t/s | 146 t/s | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Output price | $2.50/1M | $14.00/1M | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Gemini 2.5 Flash |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | Tie |
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Pros
- +Broad native support for multiple input modalities
- +Efficient handling of very large contexts
- +Strong balance of speed and capability
Cons
- –Lower peak performance than larger Gemini variants on complex tasks
- –Speed optimizations may reduce depth on nuanced reasoning
- –Practical limits on full 1M-token context utilization
GPT-5.2-Codex
Pros
- +Very large context window for extended inputs
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Seamless integration of text and image data
Cons
- –Restricted to text and image modalities
- –High resource demands at maximum context length
- –No native support for audio or video
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-5.2-Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.