A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
GPT-5.4 leads decisively on intelligence (51.4 vs 25) for complex multimodal reasoning while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview dominates speed (290 t/s vs 145 t/s) and price ($1.5 vs $15 per million tokens). Gemini also provides native audio and video handling that GPT-5.4 lacks. The models are nearly tied on context size, making Gemini the practical choice for high-volume, cost-sensitive workloads and GPT-5.4 the pick when maximum capability matters most.
| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GPT-5.4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 25 | 51.4 | GPT-5.4 |
| Output speed | 290 t/s | 146 t/s | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Output price | $1.50/1M | $15.00/1M | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Context | 1049K | 1050K | GPT-5.4 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | Tie |
GPT-5.4 scores 51.4 on the intelligence index compared to Gemini's 25, giving it a clear advantage for tasks requiring deeper multimodal reasoning. Gemini's lower score aligns with its Lite design that trades depth for efficiency. This gap makes GPT-5.4 preferable when capability outweighs speed.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview delivers 290.34 tokens per second versus GPT-5.4's 145.62 t/s, making it roughly twice as fast. Its lightweight design is explicitly optimized for speed. GPT-5.4's slower rate may increase latency on large-context inputs.
Gemini costs $1.5 per million tokens while GPT-5.4 costs $15 per million, an order-of-magnitude difference. This makes Gemini far more economical for high-volume multimodal usage. Both are proprietary models from major providers.
Gemini offers unified native support for video, audio, and files in addition to text and images. GPT-5.4 supports text, image, and file tasks but explicitly lacks native audio or video. Context windows are nearly identical at roughly 1 million tokens.
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Select Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview for speed, cost efficiency, and full audio-video multimodal support in high-throughput scenarios. Choose GPT-5.4 when maximum intelligence for complex document and reasoning tasks is the priority. The models serve different trade-off profiles rather than direct substitutes.
GPT-5.4 is better for intelligence-heavy tasks while Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is better for speed, cost, and native audio-video support; neither is universally superior.