Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5 Nano
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5 Nano: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | GPT-5 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 33.5 | 26.8 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Output speed | 310 t/s | 170 t/s | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Output price | $1.50/1M | $0.40/1M | GPT-5 Nano |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | Tie |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Pros
- +Broad native support for multiple modalities
- +Very large context window for document and media tasks
- +Lightweight design optimized for speed
- +Unified handling of video, audio and files
Cons
- –Preview model may show inconsistent behavior
- –Lite variant trades depth for efficiency
- –Experimental features can be less reliable than stable releases
GPT-5 Nano
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts efficiently
- +Supports text, image, and file inputs
- +Lightweight design for faster responses
- +Practical for extended document tasks
Cons
- –Lower capability depth than full-scale models
- –May struggle with highly complex reasoning
- –Trade-off in advanced task performance
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-5 Nano are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.