Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Nano
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 Nano: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5.4 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 25 | 38.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Output speed | 280 t/s | 151 t/s | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Output price | $1.50/1M | $1.25/1M | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | Tie |
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Pros
- +High speed and low latency
- +Handles very large context windows
- +Broad modality support in a lightweight package
Cons
- –Reduced depth on highly complex reasoning tasks
- –Lite design trades peak capability for speed
- –May require more guidance on nuanced or creative outputs
GPT-5.4 Nano
Pros
- +Very large 400k token context
- +Handles file, image, and text inputs
- +Multimodal flexibility
Cons
- –Nano size may limit depth on complex tasks
- –No audio or video modalities
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5.4 Nano are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.