Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Llama 4 Scout
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Llama 4 Scout: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 57.2 | 13.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Output speed | 130 t/s | 112 t/s | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
| Output price | $12.00/1M | $0.30/1M | Llama 4 Scout |
| Context | 1049K | 10000K | Llama 4 Scout |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Open-weight | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | Tie |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Pros
- +Handles up to 1M token contexts
- +Native support for audio, image, video, and text
- +Strong integration of multiple modalities
- +Effective for large-scale document analysis
Cons
- –Preview model may show inconsistent outputs
- –High resource use with maximum context
- –Requires verification on complex tasks
Llama 4 Scout
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Strong reasoning over long inputs
Cons
- –High compute cost at maximum context
- –Limited to text and image modalities only
- –May exhibit latency on very long sequences
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Llama 4 Scout are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.