Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 45.4 | 10 | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Output speed | 157 t/s | 111 t/s | Gemini 3.5 Flash |
| Output price | $9.00/1M | $0.30/1M | Llama 4 Scout |
| Context | 1049K | 10000K | Llama 4 Scout |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | Tie |
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Pros
- +High speed and efficiency
- +Strong multimodal integration
- +Large context window support
Cons
- –Trades depth for speed on complex tasks
- –Variable performance on specialized domains
- –Context utilization depends on task
Llama 4 Scout
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Strong reasoning over long inputs
Cons
- –High compute cost at maximum context
- –Limited to text and image modalities only
- –May exhibit latency on very long sequences
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 3.5 Flash and Llama 4 Scout are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.