Skip to content

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Llama 4 Scout

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Llama 4 Scout: side by side

SpecGemini 3 Flash PreviewLlama 4 ScoutWinner
Intelligence46.413.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Output speed185 t/s112 t/sGemini 3 Flash Preview
Output price$3.00/1M$0.30/1MLlama 4 Scout
Context1049K10000KLlama 4 Scout
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryOpen-weightTie
ProviderGoogleMetaTie

Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Pros

  • +Broad native support for text, image, audio, video and files
  • +Efficient handling of very large contexts
  • +Fast inference suitable for preview use

Cons

  • Preview status may include occasional instability
  • Reasoning depth can be shallower than full-scale models
  • No native tool-use or external browsing mentioned
Full Gemini 3 Flash Preview review →

Llama 4 Scout

Pros

  • +Extremely large context window
  • +Native multimodal input support
  • +Strong reasoning over long inputs

Cons

  • High compute cost at maximum context
  • Limited to text and image modalities only
  • May exhibit latency on very long sequences
Full Llama 4 Scout review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Llama 4 Scout are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons