Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4 Nano
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Quick verdict: which should you choose?
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you need
- ✓Higher intelligence index for complex reasoning tasks
- ✓Faster output speed at 146.5 tokens per second
- ✓Support for file inputs in addition to images and text
- ✓Proprietary OpenAI model with potentially better reliability
Choose GPT-5.4 Nano if you need
- ✓Much larger 1M token context window
- ✓Lower price at $0.6 per million tokens
- ✓Open-weight availability from Meta for customization
- ✓Native multimodal text and image support at reduced cost
Verdict
GPT-5.4 Nano leads on intelligence (44 vs 18.4) and output speed (146.5 t/s vs 96.34 t/s) while adding file-input support, making it stronger for complex multimodal tasks. Llama 4 Maverick wins on context size (1M vs 400k tokens), price ($0.6 vs $1.25 per 1M), and open-weight access. The choice hinges on whether proprietary performance or cost plus openness matters more.
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4 Nano: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.4 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.3 | 38.2 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Output speed | 93 t/s | 157 t/s | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Output price | $0.60/1M | $1.25/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Detailed analysis
Intelligence
Winner: GPT-5.4 NanoGPT-5.4 Nano scores 44 on the intelligence index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 18.4. This gap indicates stronger performance on complex multimodal tasks despite the Nano designation.
Speed
Winner: GPT-5.4 NanoGPT-5.4 Nano outputs at 146.5 tokens per second versus Llama 4 Maverick's 96.34 t/s. The speed advantage favors GPT-5.4 Nano for high-volume workloads.
Pricing & Access
Winner: Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick costs $0.6 per million tokens versus $1.25 for GPT-5.4 Nano. It also provides open weights, enabling local or customized deployment.
Context Window
Winner: Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick offers a 1,048,576 token context compared to GPT-5.4 Nano's 400,000 tokens. The larger window supports longer documents and conversations.
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
GPT-5.4 Nano
Pros
- +Very large 400k token context
- +Handles file, image, and text inputs
- +Multimodal flexibility
Cons
- –Nano size may limit depth on complex tasks
- –No audio or video modalities
Summary: Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Select GPT-5.4 Nano when intelligence, speed, and file handling are priorities. Choose Llama 4 Maverick for maximum context, lower cost, and open-weight flexibility. Both remain limited to text and image modalities.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4 Nano is better on intelligence and speed; Llama 4 Maverick is better on context size, price, and openness.