Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5 Codex
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5 Codex: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5 Codex | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.3 | 36.1 | GPT-5 Codex |
| Output speed | 94 t/s | 158 t/s | GPT-5 Codex |
| Output price | $0.60/1M | $10.00/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
GPT-5 Codex
Pros
- +Handles extremely large inputs effectively
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Unified text and image reasoning
Cons
- –High resource demands with maximum context
- –Limited to text and static images
- –Potential coherence loss in very long outputs
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Llama 4 Maverick and GPT-5 Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.