Llama 4 Maverick vs Grok 4.3
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Llama 4 Maverick vs Grok 4.3: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Grok 4.3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.3 | 35.4 | Grok 4.3 |
| Output speed | 94 t/s | 136 t/s | Grok 4.3 |
| Output price | $0.60/1M | $2.50/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1049K | 1000K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | xAI | Tie |
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
Grok 4.3
Pros
- +Strong performance on complex multi-step reasoning
- +Large context window for document-level tasks
- +Helpful and direct response style
Cons
- –Vision capabilities less mature than specialized models
- –Occasional over-refusal on edge-case queries
- –High computational cost for maximum context usage
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Llama 4 Maverick and Grok 4.3 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.