Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4.1 Nano
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4.1 Nano: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-4.1 Nano | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 13.5 | 13 | Llama 4 Scout |
| Output speed | 112 t/s | 168 t/s | GPT-4.1 Nano |
| Output price | $0.30/1M | $0.40/1M | Llama 4 Scout |
| Context | 10000K | 1048K | Llama 4 Scout |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Llama 4 Scout
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Strong reasoning over long inputs
Cons
- –High compute cost at maximum context
- –Limited to text and image modalities only
- –May exhibit latency on very long sequences
GPT-4.1 Nano
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native support for images, text, and files
- +OpenAI multimodal architecture
Cons
- –Nano size may reduce depth on complex tasks
- –Performance trade-offs for efficiency
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Llama 4 Scout and GPT-4.1 Nano are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.