GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs Grok 4.3
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs Grok 4.3: side by side
| Spec | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max | Grok 4.3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | — | 43.9 | Tie |
| Output speed | — | 135 t/s | Tie |
| Output price | $10.00/1M | $2.50/1M | Grok 4.3 |
| Context | 400K | 1000K | Grok 4.3 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI | Tie |
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts
- +Strong coding focus
- +Combines text and image inputs
- +Suitable for complex technical workflows
Cons
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –High resource demands for large contexts
- –No support for other media types
Grok 4.3
Pros
- +Strong performance on complex multi-step reasoning
- +Large context window for document-level tasks
- +Helpful and direct response style
- +Integrated real-time tool access
Cons
- –Vision capabilities less mature than specialized models
- –Occasional over-refusal on edge-case queries
- –High computational cost for maximum context usage
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Grok 4.3 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.