A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
GPT-5.4 Pro leads on raw context scale (1.05M tokens) and advanced reasoning over extended multimodal inputs, while GPT-5.1 provides concrete speed (87.24 t/s) and dramatically lower cost ($10 vs $180 per 1M). GPT-5.1 wins on verifiable performance metrics where GPT-5.4 Pro leaves intelligence_index and output_speed unspecified. Both share identical modality limits and proprietary OpenAI access.
| Spec | GPT-5.1 | GPT-5.4 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 20.4 | — | Tie |
| Output speed | 82 t/s | — | Tie |
| Output price | $10.00/1M | $180.00/1M | GPT-5.1 |
| Context | 400K | 1050K | GPT-5.4 Pro |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI | Tie |
GPT-5.4 Pro offers 1,050,000 tokens versus GPT-5.1's 400,000. This gives GPT-5.4 Pro a clear edge for very large inputs. Both support text, image, and file modalities within their respective windows.
GPT-5.1 costs $10 per 1M tokens while GPT-5.4 Pro costs $180 per 1M. The 18x price difference favors GPT-5.1 for cost-sensitive workloads. No other pricing details are provided.
GPT-5.1 lists a concrete speed of 87.24 t/s. GPT-5.4 Pro leaves speed unspecified and notes higher latency on maximum-length inputs. GPT-5.1 therefore has the only verifiable speed advantage.
Both models support text, image, and file inputs with strong integration. Neither offers native audio or video. Strengths descriptions are comparable within these shared limits.
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Choose GPT-5.4 Pro when maximum context and extended-context reasoning are essential. Choose GPT-5.1 when published speed, lower cost, and verified metrics matter most. Both remain proprietary OpenAI models without audio or video support.
GPT-5.4 Pro leads on context size and reasoning depth; GPT-5.1 leads on known speed and price. The better choice depends on whether scale or cost/speed is prioritized.