Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs GLM 5.2
A side-by-side comparison of two llm models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs GLM 5.2: side by side
| Spec | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | GLM 5.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | — | 51.1 | Tie |
| Output speed | — | 107 t/s | Tie |
| Output price | $1.80/1M | $3.08/1M | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| Context | 1049K | 1049K | Tie |
| Params | 480B | — | Tie |
| Provider | Alibaba Qwen | Z.AI | Tie |
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Pros
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Handles up to 1M token contexts
- +Large-scale model capacity
Cons
- –Text-only modality
- –Less generalist capability outside coding
- –High inference compute cost
GLM 5.2
Pros
- +Supports very large context windows
- +Strong performance on extended document tasks
- +Versatile across general text workloads
Cons
- –Text-only modality
- –No vision or multimodal capabilities
- –Performance details beyond context length remain unverified
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and GLM 5.2 are both llm models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.