Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs GPT-5 Codex

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs GPT-5 Codex: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.6 (Fast)GPT-5 CodexWinner
Intelligence52.944.6Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
Output speed40 t/s150 t/sGPT-5 Codex
Output price$150.00/1M$10.00/1MGPT-5 Codex
Context1000K400KClaude Opus 4.6 (Fast)
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryProprietaryTie
ProviderAnthropicOpenAITie

Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)

Pros

  • +Strong reasoning depth
  • +Effective large-context handling
  • +Safety-conscious responses
  • +Fast inference for its class

Cons

  • May refuse borderline requests
  • Conservative output style
  • Vision limited to static images
Full Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) review →

GPT-5 Codex

Pros

  • +Handles extremely large inputs effectively
  • +Strong coding specialization
  • +Unified text and image reasoning

Cons

  • High resource demands with maximum context
  • Limited to text and static images
  • Potential coherence loss in very long outputs
Full GPT-5 Codex review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) and GPT-5 Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons