Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-5
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Quick verdict: which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) if you need
- ✓high intelligence and nuanced reasoning on complex multimodal inputs
- ✓maximum 1M-token context for large text, image, and file handling
- ✓strong safety alignment and careful response behavior
- ✓effective large-context processing despite resource demands
Choose GPT-5 if you need
- ✓very high output speed at 170.47 t/s for rapid responses
- ✓low cost at $10 per 1M tokens for budget-sensitive use
- ✓native multimodal input with seamless text-image-file integration
- ✓quick iteration on standard multimodal tasks under 400k context
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) leads in intelligence (53.5 vs 15.3) and context size (1M vs 400k tokens) with stronger safety alignment and nuanced reasoning, while GPT-5 leads in speed (170.47 t/s vs 51.48 t/s) and price ($10 vs $150 per 1M tokens). Claude suits complex multimodal tasks needing careful handling of massive inputs; GPT-5 offers faster, cheaper throughput but with unverified performance and smaller context. The facts favor Claude for quality-focused multimodal work and GPT-5 for efficiency.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-5: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) | GPT-5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 53.5 | 15.3 | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) |
| Output speed | 51 t/s | 170 t/s | GPT-5 |
| Output price | $150.00/1M | $10.00/1M | GPT-5 |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Detailed analysis
Intelligence
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) scores 53.5 on the intelligence index compared to GPT-5's 15.3. This gap supports stronger nuanced reasoning and safety alignment for multimodal tasks. GPT-5's lower score and hypothetical status limit verified performance claims.
Speed
Winner: GPT-5GPT-5 delivers 170.47 tokens per second versus Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)'s 51.48 t/s. The speed advantage favors GPT-5 for high-throughput multimodal workloads. Claude notes that multimodal tasks can still increase its response time.
Pricing
Winner: GPT-5GPT-5 costs $10 per 1M tokens while Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) costs $150 per 1M tokens. The fifteenfold price difference makes GPT-5 far more economical for frequent use. Both remain proprietary models from their respective providers.
Context & Multimodal Handling
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) provides a 1M-token context window against GPT-5's 400k tokens. It emphasizes effective large-context handling for massive text, image, and file inputs. GPT-5 offers native multimodal support but faces higher resource demands at maximum context.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
Pros
- +Strong safety alignment
- +Nuanced and careful reasoning
- +Effective large-context handling
Cons
- –May decline edge-case or risky requests
- –Multimodal tasks can increase response time
- –Large context usage remains resource-heavy
GPT-5
Pros
- +Very large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Seamless text-image-file integration
Cons
- –Hypothetical model with unverified performance
- –High resource demands for maximum context
- –Potential latency on large multimodal tasks
Summary: Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs GPT-5
Select Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) when intelligence, safety, and maximum context matter most for demanding multimodal work. Choose GPT-5 when speed and low cost are priorities for simpler or high-volume tasks. The data clearly separate the models by quality versus efficiency trade-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) is stronger for intelligence and large-context multimodal reasoning; GPT-5 is better for speed and cost on lighter workloads.