Skip to content
Sign in

Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs Grok 4.3

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) vs Grok 4.3: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.7 (Fast)Grok 4.3Winner
Intelligence53.535.4Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)
Output speed50 t/s136 t/sGrok 4.3
Output price$150.00/1M$2.50/1MGrok 4.3
Context1000K1000KTie
ParamsTie
ProviderAnthropicxAITie

Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast)

Pros

  • +Strong safety alignment
  • +Nuanced and careful reasoning
  • +Effective large-context handling

Cons

  • May decline edge-case or risky requests
  • Multimodal tasks can increase response time
  • Large context usage remains resource-heavy
Full Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) review →

Grok 4.3

Pros

  • +Strong performance on complex multi-step reasoning
  • +Large context window for document-level tasks
  • +Helpful and direct response style

Cons

  • Vision capabilities less mature than specialized models
  • Occasional over-refusal on edge-case queries
  • High computational cost for maximum context usage
Full Grok 4.3 review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) and Grok 4.3 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons