Skip to content
Sign in

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06Winner
Intelligence53.5Tie
Output speed50 t/sTie
Output price$25.00/1M$10.00/1MGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
Context1000K1049KGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06
ParamsTie
ProviderAnthropicGoogleTie

Claude Opus 4.7

Pros

  • +Handles very large contexts effectively
  • +Strong reasoning and writing quality
  • +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs

Cons

  • Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
  • Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
  • No native real-time web access
Full Claude Opus 4.7 review →

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06

Pros

  • +Very large context window
  • +Native support for multiple modalities
  • +Strong cross-modal reasoning

Cons

  • Preview version may show variability
  • High resource use with maximum context
  • Occasional modality-specific inconsistencies
Full Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons