Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 57.3 | — | Tie |
| Output speed | 51 t/s | — | Tie |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $12.00/1M | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools |
| Context | 1000K | 1049K | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
- +Careful and safety-aligned responses
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Pros
- +Strong cross-modal coherence on mixed inputs
- +Effective use of very large context windows
- +Flexible extension via custom tools
Cons
- –Preview status may include occasional instability
- –Large contexts can increase latency and cost
- –Tool setup requires additional configuration
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.