Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 57.3 | 33.5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 51 t/s | 310 t/s | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $1.50/1M | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Context | 1000K | 1049K | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | Tie |
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
- +Careful and safety-aligned responses
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Pros
- +High speed and low latency
- +Handles very large context windows
- +Broad modality support in a lightweight package
- +Resource-efficient inference
Cons
- –Reduced depth on highly complex reasoning tasks
- –Lite design trades peak capability for speed
- –May require more guidance on nuanced or creative outputs
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.