Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Quick verdict: which should you choose?
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need
- ✓Choose GPT-5 if you need high output speed above 167 t/s for rapid multimodal responses.
- ✓Choose GPT-5 if you need lower pricing at $10 per million tokens.
- ✓Choose GPT-5 if you need seamless native text-image-file integration on 400k context inputs.
Choose GPT-5 if you need
- ✓Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need the highest intelligence index of 53.5 for strong reasoning.
- ✓Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need effective handling of million-token multimodal contexts.
- ✓Choose Claude Opus 4.7 if you need careful safety-aligned responses with versatile inputs.
Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7 leads in intelligence and maximum context handling while GPT-5 excels in output speed and affordability. GPT-5 offers faster token generation at half the price with native multimodal integration, but its much lower intelligence index and smaller context limit it on complex tasks. Claude Opus 4.7 delivers superior reasoning quality and a million-token window yet at slower speeds and higher cost.
Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5: side by side
| Spec | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 53.5 | 15.3 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Output speed | 50 t/s | 167 t/s | GPT-5 |
| Output price | $25.00/1M | $10.00/1M | GPT-5 |
| Context | 1000K | 400K | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI | Tie |
Detailed analysis
Intelligence
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 scores 53.5 on the intelligence index compared to GPT-5's 15.3. This gap supports stronger reasoning and writing quality for Claude on complex multimodal tasks according to the listed strengths.
Speed
Winner: GPT-5GPT-5 achieves 167.38 tokens per second versus Claude Opus 4.7's 50.25 t/s. The higher speed favors GPT-5 for latency-sensitive multimodal outputs despite noted potential latency on its largest tasks.
Context Size
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7Claude Opus 4.7 supports a 1M token context while GPT-5 is limited to 400k tokens. Both handle large multimodal inputs but Claude's larger window enables more effective processing of extensive inputs.
Pricing
Winner: GPT-5GPT-5 costs $10 per million tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.7 at $25 per million. This makes GPT-5 the more economical option for high-volume multimodal usage.
Claude Opus 4.7
Pros
- +Handles very large contexts effectively
- +Strong reasoning and writing quality
- +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
Cons
- –Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
- –Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
- –No native real-time web access
GPT-5
Pros
- +Very large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Seamless text-image-file integration
Cons
- –Hypothetical model with unverified performance
- –High resource demands for maximum context
- –Potential latency on large multimodal tasks
Summary: Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5
Select GPT-5 when speed and cost are priorities for native multimodal work within 400k tokens. Opt for Claude Opus 4.7 when maximum context, higher intelligence, and careful reasoning matter most despite slower and pricier operation.
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger for intelligence and very large contexts while GPT-5 is better for speed and price; the better choice depends on whether reasoning depth or fast affordable outputs are needed.