Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Codex

A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5 Codex: side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.7GPT-5 CodexWinner
Intelligence57.344.6Claude Opus 4.7
Output speed51 t/s150 t/sGPT-5 Codex
Output price$25.00/1M$10.00/1MGPT-5 Codex
Context1000K400KClaude Opus 4.7
ParamsTie
TypeProprietaryProprietaryTie
ProviderAnthropicOpenAITie

Claude Opus 4.7

Pros

  • +Handles very large contexts effectively
  • +Strong reasoning and writing quality
  • +Versatile with text, image, and file inputs
  • +Careful and safety-aligned responses

Cons

  • Can be overly cautious or refuse edge cases
  • Higher latency on complex multimodal tasks
  • No native real-time web access
Full Claude Opus 4.7 review →

GPT-5 Codex

Pros

  • +Handles extremely large inputs effectively
  • +Strong coding specialization
  • +Unified text and image reasoning

Cons

  • High resource demands with maximum context
  • Limited to text and static images
  • Potential coherence loss in very long outputs
Full GPT-5 Codex review →

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your needs. Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5 Codex are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.

More ai model comparisons