Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs Grok 4.20
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools vs Grok 4.20: side by side
| Spec | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Grok 4.20 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | — | 49.3 | Tie |
| Output speed | — | 168 t/s | Tie |
| Output price | $12.00/1M | $2.50/1M | Grok 4.20 |
| Context | 1049K | 2000K | Grok 4.20 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | xAI | Tie |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
Pros
- +Strong cross-modal coherence on mixed inputs
- +Effective use of very large context windows
- +Flexible extension via custom tools
Cons
- –Preview status may include occasional instability
- –Large contexts can increase latency and cost
- –Tool setup requires additional configuration
Grok 4.20
Pros
- +Handles extremely large contexts up to 2M tokens
- +Native support for text, image, and file inputs
- +Multimodal integration in a single model
Cons
- –No audio or video modality support
- –Very large context can increase latency
- –Performance depends on input quality and structure
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools and Grok 4.20 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.