Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-4.1 Mini
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-4.1 Mini: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-4.1 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.3 | 16.3 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Output speed | 94 t/s | 82 t/s | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Output price | $0.60/1M | $1.60/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1049K | 1048K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
GPT-4.1 Mini
Pros
- +Handles over one million tokens of context
- +Processes images, text, and files together
- +Suitable for large document workflows
Cons
- –Mini variant may trade depth for efficiency
- –No audio or video modality support
- –Large context can increase response latency
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Llama 4 Maverick and GPT-4.1 Mini are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.