Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.3 | 51.4 | GPT-5.4 |
| Output speed | 93 t/s | 147 t/s | GPT-5.4 |
| Output price | $0.60/1M | $15.00/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1049K | 1050K | GPT-5.4 |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
GPT-5.4
Pros
- +Handles extremely large contexts
- +Seamless text-image-file integration
- +Strong at document-level tasks
Cons
- –No native audio or video support
- –Large context can increase latency
- –May need careful prompting for complex tasks
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Llama 4 Maverick and GPT-5.4 are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.