Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4 Mini
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Quick verdict: which should you choose?
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you need
- ✓Higher intelligence index for complex reasoning tasks
- ✓Faster output speed at 183.33 tokens per second
- ✓Native support for files, images, and text in one workflow
- ✓Proprietary OpenAI backend for document-heavy multimodal jobs
Choose GPT-5.4 Mini if you need
- ✓Much lower price at $0.6 per million tokens
- ✓Larger 1M token context window
- ✓Open-weight access from Meta for customization
- ✓Strong general reasoning at lower cost for text-image tasks
Verdict
GPT-5.4 Mini leads in intelligence (40 vs 14.3) and output speed (183.33 t/s vs 116.34 t/s) while adding native file support, making it stronger for complex multimodal document workflows. Llama 4 Maverick wins on price ($0.6 vs $4.5 per 1M tokens) and context size (1M vs 400k tokens) plus open weights. The choice hinges on whether proprietary performance or cost-plus-scale matters more.
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4 Mini: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.4 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 14.3 | 40 | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Output speed | 116 t/s | 183 t/s | GPT-5.4 Mini |
| Output price | $0.60/1M | $4.50/1M | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Context | 1049K | 400K | Llama 4 Maverick |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Detailed analysis
Intelligence
Winner: GPT-5.4 MiniGPT-5.4 Mini scores 40 on the intelligence index compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 14.3. This gap favors A for tasks needing deeper multimodal understanding. B's lower score aligns with its noted potential for hallucinations on complex tasks.
Pricing
Winner: Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick costs $0.6 per million tokens versus GPT-5.4 Mini's $4.5. The sevenfold price difference makes B far more economical for high-volume use. Both list unknown parameter counts, so cost remains the clearest differentiator.
Speed & Context
Winner: TieGPT-5.4 Mini outputs at 183.33 t/s with a 400k context while Llama 4 Maverick runs at 116.34 t/s with a 1M context. A wins on speed; B wins on maximum context length. Long contexts in either model can raise latency or compute demands.
Modalities & Ecosystem
Winner: GPT-5.4 MiniGPT-5.4 Mini supports files, images, and text natively for flexible document workflows. Llama 4 Maverick is limited to text and images but offers open weights. Proprietary access versus open-source availability creates different deployment trade-offs.
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- +Very large 1M token context window
- +Native multimodal support for text and images
- +Open weights from Meta
Cons
- –High compute requirements for full context
- –Limited to text and image modalities
- –Potential for hallucinations on complex tasks
GPT-5.4 Mini
Pros
- +Very large context window
- +Native support for files, images, and text
- +Flexible multimodal workflows
Cons
- –Mini size may reduce depth on complex reasoning
- –Performance depends on input quality across modalities
- –Long contexts can increase latency
Summary: Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Select GPT-5.4 Mini when intelligence, speed, and file handling outweigh cost. Choose Llama 4 Maverick when budget, maximum context, and open weights are priorities. Neither model dominates every dimension.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4 Mini is stronger on intelligence and speed with broader file support; Llama 4 Maverick is better on price and context size.