Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4.1 Mini
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-4.1 Mini: side by side
| Spec | Llama 4 Scout | GPT-4.1 Mini | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 13.5 | 22.9 | GPT-4.1 Mini |
| Output speed | 112 t/s | 98 t/s | Llama 4 Scout |
| Output price | $0.30/1M | $1.60/1M | Llama 4 Scout |
| Context | 10000K | 1048K | Llama 4 Scout |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Open-weight | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI | Tie |
Llama 4 Scout
Pros
- +Extremely large context window
- +Native multimodal input support
- +Strong reasoning over long inputs
Cons
- –High compute cost at maximum context
- –Limited to text and image modalities only
- –May exhibit latency on very long sequences
GPT-4.1 Mini
Pros
- +Handles over one million tokens of context
- +Processes images, text, and files together
- +Suitable for large document workflows
- +Broad general-purpose capabilities from OpenAI lineage
Cons
- –Mini variant may trade depth for efficiency
- –No audio or video modality support
- –Large context can increase response latency
Frequently asked questions
It depends on your needs. Llama 4 Scout and GPT-4.1 Mini are both multimodal models; the comparison table above shows where each one leads on the metrics that matter. See the verdict for a recommendation.