GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT Chat Latest
A side-by-side comparison of two multimodal models — real specs, pricing, strengths and weaknesses, and a clear verdict on which to choose. Kept current by our agents.
Quick verdict: which should you choose?
Choose GPT-5.2-Codex if you need
- ✓Choose GPT Chat Latest if you need seamless handling of text, image, and file inputs.
- ✓Choose GPT Chat Latest if you need flexible performance across creative and analytical tasks.
- ✓Choose GPT Chat Latest if you need natural multi-turn dialogue.
- ✓Choose GPT Chat Latest if you need strong performance on extended documents with file support.
Choose GPT Chat Latest if you need
- ✓Choose GPT-5.2-Codex if you need strong coding specialization.
- ✓Choose GPT-5.2-Codex if you need lower output price at $14 per 1M tokens.
- ✓Choose GPT-5.2-Codex if you need output speed of 144.39 t/s.
- ✓Choose GPT-5.2-Codex if you need seamless integration of text and image data at scale.
Verdict
GPT-5.2-Codex leads on known speed (144.39 t/s), lower price ($14/1M vs $30/1M), and coding specialization while sharing the same 400k context. GPT Chat Latest leads on broader input support including files plus flexibility for creative and multi-turn tasks. Both remain proprietary OpenAI models with identical context size and no audio/video support.
GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT Chat Latest: side by side
| Spec | GPT-5.2-Codex | GPT Chat Latest | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 49 | — | Tie |
| Output speed | 144 t/s | — | Tie |
| Output price | $14.00/1M | $30.00/1M | GPT-5.2-Codex |
| Context | 400K | 400K | Tie |
| Params | — | — | Tie |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary | Tie |
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI | Tie |
Detailed analysis
Pricing
Winner: GPT-5.2-CodexGPT-5.2-Codex costs $14 per 1M output tokens while GPT Chat Latest costs $30 per 1M. Both share the same 400000 context window. The price difference favors GPT-5.2-Codex for high-volume use.
Speed
Winner: GPT-5.2-CodexGPT-5.2-Codex reports output speed of 144.39 t/s. No speed figure is provided for GPT Chat Latest. Large context increases latency for both models.
Input Modalities
Winner: GPT Chat LatestGPT Chat Latest supports text, image, and file inputs. GPT-5.2-Codex is restricted to text and image modalities with no native audio or video. Both handle image data seamlessly.
Task Specialization
Winner: TieGPT-5.2-Codex offers strong coding specialization. GPT Chat Latest provides flexibility across creative and analytical tasks plus natural multi-turn dialogue. Intelligence index is given only for GPT-5.2-Codex at 49.
GPT-5.2-Codex
Pros
- +Very large context window for extended inputs
- +Strong coding specialization
- +Seamless integration of text and image data
Cons
- –Restricted to text and image modalities
- –High resource demands at maximum context length
- –No native support for audio or video
GPT Chat Latest
Pros
- +Seamless handling of text, image, and file inputs
- +Strong performance on extended documents
- +Flexible across creative and analytical tasks
- +Natural multi-turn dialogue
Cons
- –Can still hallucinate facts or details
- –Large context increases cost and latency
- –No native real-time external tool access
Summary: GPT-5.2-Codex vs GPT Chat Latest
Select GPT-5.2-Codex when coding focus, lower cost, or measured speed matter most. Select GPT Chat Latest when file inputs or broad creative flexibility are required. Both share the same context length and OpenAI provider.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.2-Codex is better on price and speed where data is available; GPT Chat Latest is better on file input support and task flexibility.